Dr. Priti Amritkar
Director – Labs | Envirocare Labs
In the intricate and high-stakes world of laboratory testing, Proficiency Testing (PT) plays a critical role in upholding the credibility and competency of analytical laboratories. Yet, in many laboratories, PT remains misunderstood or underutilized—reduced to a compliance activity to maintain ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation.
In truth, PT is much more than a regulatory formality. It is a diagnostic tool, a mirror to internal quality systems, and a strategic resource for long-term technical growth and organizational excellence. For laboratories committed to accurate, reliable, and timely test results, PT must be embraced as a culture of continuous improvement, not a checkbox on a compliance list.
At its core, Proficiency Testing is a structured way for labs to evaluate their analytical performance by comparing results against other laboratories or known values. It verifies the technical competency of a lab, providing assurance to regulators, customers, and the broader scientific community that test results are accurate and trustworthy.
However, the true power of PT lies in what happens after the results are received. A non-conforming result isn’t a failure—it’s an opportunity. It’s a cue to dive deep into methods, instruments, and training, to unearth hidden gaps and enhance operational robustness.
Despite its value, many laboratories struggle to extract meaningful insights from PT participation. Several issues contribute to this:
1. Lack of Technical Depth
Root cause analysis (RCA) after PT failures often remains superficial due to the lack of technical expertise or understanding of method validation, uncertainty estimation, or equipment calibration. Labs may simply re-run the test without investigating why an error occurred.
2. Inadequate Analyst Training
PT performance is directly linked to how well-trained the lab staff is. If analysts are unfamiliar with the nuances of a particular test method, misinterpret results, or mishandle equipment, it will reflect in PT outcomes.
3. Improper or Unvalidated Methods
Using outdated or improperly validated methods increases the risk of inaccurate results. Deviations from standardized protocols or lack of method suitability assessments can lead to critical performance lapses.
4. Limited Management Involvement
When lab management sees PT as an operational expense rather than a strategic tool, it creates a disconnect. Without top-down support for quality initiatives, laboratories lack the motivation or resources to correct deficiencies.
In today’s competitive market, price wars have forced many testing labs into survival mode. Clients often prioritize cost over competence, selecting labs based on pricing rather than technical capability. This compromises the quality of testing and undermines the entire food safety and public health framework.
Without industry-wide enforcement of quality standards or reward mechanisms for high-performing labs, even PT becomes a formality. Accurate testing is not incentivized, while poor performance often goes unchecked—discouraging labs from investing in quality improvements.
Excelling in Proficiency Testing doesn’t happen by chance. It is the outcome of rigorous systems, competent people, validated methods, and reliable instruments. The following are key enablers of PT success:
Above all, a quality-first mindset is essential—doing the right thing not because the standard demands it, but because integrity and science demand it.
Laboratories are often the most undervalued players in the food safety ecosystem. Despite being responsible for the final test report—a document that impacts public health, brand reputation, and trade decisions—labs are rarely empowered or recognized for their role. Testing labs must therefore reposition themselves. They must move from being passive service providers to active contributors in the food and pharma quality chain. This requires investing in technical capabilities, engaging with PT constructively, and building trust through data reliability.
Proficiency Testing providers aren’t just evaluators—they are enablers of excellence. Their role extends beyond sending samples and publishing results. They must:
When PT providers collaborate with labs as partners, the quality of the entire testing ecosystem strengthens.
As Dr. Priti Amritkar rightly observes, “PT is not just about passing or failing—it is a reflection of a lab’s ethos.” It tells the story of a lab’s commitment to its systems, people, and processes. A successful PT round demonstrates not just technical prowess, but also the lab’s operational maturity and pursuit of excellence.
As Aristotle aptly said, “We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.”
In this context, testing labs must rise above minimum compliance. They must integrate PT into their strategic quality roadmap—not as an obligation, but as a self-assessment mechanism and tool for growth. It’s time for labs to shift from reactive to proactive, from passive participation to active improvement.
Only with such a cultural shift will the vision of a robust, reliable, and resilient laboratory network—one that underpins national and global food safety—become a reality.
Reference:
This article was originally published in Spinco Biotech Cutting Edge.
How often should a lab participate in PT? For many labs, the answer seems straightforward:…
Proficiency Testing for International Trade is a critical component in ensuring the credibility of your…
Maintaining strict compliance standards is non-negotiable for any successful laboratory. But what if your essential…
What's the worst that could happen?" In a laboratory setting, this isn't just a casual…
In the world of testing, precision isn't just a goal—it's a necessity. Yet, one crucial…
In the fast-paced world of laboratory testing and calibration, one crucial process stands as the…
